首页> 外文OA文献 >Agroecology: polysemy, pluralism and controversies
【2h】

Agroecology: polysemy, pluralism and controversies

机译:农业生态学:一词多义,多元化和争议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years, a growing number of actors and institutions, in different countries, have begun using the notion of Agroecology, which has led to an expansion of its polysemy and its controversies. Taking this into account, this paper analyzes, based on the Brazilian and French experiences, the peculiarities of Agroecology in four different fields: science, social movements, government policies, and education. It also discusses three other issues: the analytical, programmatic and normative discourses; the different definitions, in the fields of science and education, of the object of study of Agroecology; and the different formulations regarding its fundamental principles. It is argued that, in this new context, recognition of this pluralism and the controversies acquires a central role in the construction of knowledge in the various fields linked to Agroecology.
机译:近年来,不同国家中越来越多的参与者和机构已经开始使用农业生态学的概念,这导致了其多义性及其争议的扩大。考虑到这一点,本文基于巴西和法国的经验,分析了农业生态学在四个不同领域的特殊性:科学,社会运动,政府政策和教育。它还讨论了其他三个问题:分析性,程序性和规范性论述;在科学和教育领域,农业生态学研究对象的定义不同;以及关于其基本原理的不同表述。有人认为,在这种新情况下,对这种多元性和争议的认识在与农业生态学相关的各个领域的知识建设中起着中心作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号